Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1554 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 18% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 148 vs 125 FPS
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €148.14 vs €359.99
- Up to 65% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €1.00 vs €2.88 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €359.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €148.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |