Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 286 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €148.14 vs €494.19
- Up to 67% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-14900K - €0.75 vs €2.27 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 11% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-13400F - 218 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
197
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €148.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 268 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
218
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.27/FPS
33%
Price, €
€494.19
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €494.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 269 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400F | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |