Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 99 days older than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - €148.14 vs €298.50
- Up to 46% better value when playing New World than Core i5-13600K - €1.07 vs €1.98 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 9% better in New World than Core i5-13400F - 151 vs 138 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
138
91%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €148.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 323 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
151
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.98/FPS
54%
Price, €
€298.5
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for €298.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 322 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400F | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 14 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |