Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1128 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - €359.99 vs €467.41
- Up to 14% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-12900K - €1.78 vs €2.08 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 225 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
202
90%
Value, €/FPS
€1.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€359.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €359.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6247 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
225
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.08/FPS
86%
Price, €
€467.41
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for €467.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6246 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |