Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 426 days older than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - €148.14 vs €467.41
- Up to 68% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-12900K - €0.32 vs €0.99 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-13400F - 474 vs 458 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
458
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €148.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 249 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
474
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
32%
Price, €
€467.41
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €467.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 248 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400F | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |