Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100 is 219 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 199 vs 198 FPS
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €128.17 vs €379.64
- Up to 67% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €0.64 vs €1.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
198
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.92/FPS
33%
Price, €
€379.64
33%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
199
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€128.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €128.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |