Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 638 days newer than Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in War Thunder than Core i3-7100 - 172 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 24 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
172
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€399.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |