Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 457 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6800K - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 29% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €127.21 vs €180.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.55 vs €0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18839 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
232
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€127.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €127.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18839 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |