Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i3-4170 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1218 days newer than Core i3-4170.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Rust than Core i3-4170 - 185 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €138.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 259 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1101
94.26369863013699%
Multi-Core
2130
36.76216775975147%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i3-4170 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |