Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Core i3-4170 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2185 days newer than Core i3-4170.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4170 - 136 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
126
92.64705882352942%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€138.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €138.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 318 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1101
65.92814371257485%
Multi-Core
2130
36.76851372345934%
Intel Core i3-4170 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |