Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 736 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 5 2600X - 427 vs 407 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - €219.99 vs €261.39
- Up to 11% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 3 3300X - €0.54 vs €0.61 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
427
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
88%
Price, €
€261.39
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
407
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€219.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €219.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Matisse | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |