Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 398 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €180.62 vs €399.99
- Up to 54% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €1.36 vs €2.98 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 134 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 24 vs 16 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
133
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €180.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.98/FPS
45%
Price, €
€399.99
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Whitehaven | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |