Buy on Amazon
€264.87
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 973 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 193 vs 181 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Intel Core i9-10900F (Basistakt: 2,80GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110900F
Buy for €264.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75073 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
69.68973747016707%
Multi-Core
5794
68.76335153097554%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
