Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900KF and the more expensive Core i9-10900F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-10900F - 224 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €292.53 vs €299.17
- Up to 3% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-10900F - €1.31 vs €1.35 per FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €299.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 226 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
224
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€292.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €292.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 226 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |