Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900H outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900H is 928 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 244 vs 239 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
239
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €180.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 16th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Renoir | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |