Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 6800HS outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 6800HS is 1387 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
- Performs up to 23% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G4900 - 114 vs 93 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
93
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Rembrandt | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket FP7 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
6 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Radeon 680M | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |