Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 6800HS outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 6800HS is 2332 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
- Performs up to 20% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G3900 - 185 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
154
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€52.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €52.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Rembrandt | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket FP7 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
6 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon 680M | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |