Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 947 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 90% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G4900 - 150 vs 79 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600X - €60.24 vs €141.96
- Up to 20% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen 5 5600X - €0.76 vs €0.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €141.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
79
52%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |