Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 261 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 4% better in Deathloop than Ryzen 5 3400G - 181 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - €16.99 vs €80.22
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 16 vs 8 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €80.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 267 minutes ago
Buy for €16.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 267 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
67.62589928057554%
Multi-Core
3619
45.46482412060301%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |