Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 435 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 4% better in Rocket League than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 730 vs 705 FPS
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €18.53 vs €379.64
- Up to 94% better value when playing Rocket League than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €0.03 vs €0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900K - 24 vs 16 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
730
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €18.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |