Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 1405 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 2% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron G3900 - 143 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 41% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - €51.59 vs €87.87
- Up to 39% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Ryzen 5 3400G - €0.37 vs €0.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €87.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
140
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |