Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 569 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 3% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 138 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €261.39 vs €399.99
- Up to 37% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €1.89 vs €2.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 24 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€261.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |