Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the more expensive Core i5-10600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 6 days older than the more expensive Core i5-10600K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 0% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-10600K - 301 vs 300 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - €261.39 vs €299.16
- Up to 13% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-10600K - €0.87 vs €1.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
301
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€261.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13001 minutes ago
Buy for €299.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13001 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |