Buy on Amazon
€148.27
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 363 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 3250U - 106 vs 95 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 6 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
106
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.27
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80684I59400F CORE I5-9400F 2.90GHZ SKT1151 9MB CACHE BOXED :: (Komponenten> Prozessoren CPU)
Buy for €148.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 3250U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
