Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9500T outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9500T is 645 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-9500T - 15 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500T
- Performs up to 9% better in World of Warcraft than Ryzen 3 3250U - 178 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 6 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 1st, 2018
FPS
178
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€159.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €159.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i5-9500T |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |