Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 729 days newer than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 23% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 3 3250U - 194 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 12 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€349
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |