Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 1463 days newer than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 58% better in Starfield than Ryzen 3 3250U - 76 vs 48 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
76
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€145.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €145.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |