Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1588 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700T - 15 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 9% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Ryzen 3 3250U - 124 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 8 vs 4 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€122.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €122.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |