Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 798 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €151.36 vs €154.89
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-9400F - 147 vs 131 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-9400F - €1.05 vs €1.16 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 12 vs 6 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €151.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12201 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.89
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €154.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |