Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - €71.22 vs €108.52
- Up to 29% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-10400 - €0.37 vs €0.52 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 8% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 3 3200G - 208 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
192
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €71.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
71%
Price, €
€108.52
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for €108.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |