Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 808 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - €74.85 vs €120.06
- Up to 34% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-10400 - €0.6 vs €0.91 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 3 2200G - 132 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
124
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12293 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
65%
Price, €
€120.06
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for €120.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12293 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |