Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 830 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 2779 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - €27.62 vs €191.69
- Up to 85% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen 5 1600 - €0.1 vs €0.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 6% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Phenom II X4 830 - 287 vs 270 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 12 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
270
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Buy for €191.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Deneb | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |