Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 830 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1400 is 2779 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1400 - €27.62 vs €167.49
- Up to 83% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen 5 1400 - €0.11 vs €0.66 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Phenom II X4 830 - 253 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 8 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
250
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18286 minutes ago
Buy for €167.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18287 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Deneb | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |