Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4873 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 31% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Phenom II X4 830 - 148 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€147.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €147.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 390 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Deneb | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |