Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 426 days older than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - €165.69 vs €559.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Core i9-12900K - €0.61 vs €2.04 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 1% better in Dishonored 2 than Core i5-13400F - 274 vs 272 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
272
99.27007299270073%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€165.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €165.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44037 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
274
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.04/FPS
29.901960784313726%
Price, €
€559
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €559 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44038 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Single-Core
2290
87.40458015267176%
Multi-Core
10745
69.56943994820331%
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |