Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 8 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €194.6 vs €689.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing Control than Core i9-13900KS - €0.95 vs €3.3 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Core i5-13400F - 209 vs 205 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
205
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.95/FPS
100%
Price, €
€194.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €194.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
Buy for €689 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 150 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |