Buy on Amazon
€27.62
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 830 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 4214 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - €27.62 vs €148.12
- Up to 78% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i5-11600 - €0.11 vs €0.51 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 16% better in Apex Legends than Phenom II X4 830 - 290 vs 251 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 12 vs 4 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Phenom II X4 830
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
251
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
AMD Phenom II X4 830 CPU verwendet 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 2,8 GHz 6M 95W Sockel AM2+ Sockel AM3
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Core i5-11600
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
290
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
21%
Price, €
€148.12
18%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-11600 11. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 2.8GHz Tuboboost: 4.8GHz, 6 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070811600
Buy for €148.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Phenom II X4 830
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Core i5-11600
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Deneb | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
