Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 830 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 3152 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - €27.62 vs €215.49
- Up to 49% better value when playing League of Legends than Ryzen 5 2600X - €0.73 vs €1.44 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 295% better in League of Legends than Phenom II X4 830 - 150 vs 38 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 12 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
38
25%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.44/FPS
50%
Price, €
€215.49
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €215.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Deneb | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |