Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1533 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8300 - 134 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than FX-8300 - €37.92 vs €73.57
- Up to 52% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than FX-8300 - €0.28 vs €0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €73.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €37.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |