Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3570 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1677 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3570 - 128 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 51 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - €87.75 vs €128.17
- Up to 26% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-7100 - €0.74 vs €1.0 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €128.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15183 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
118
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€87.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €87.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Core i5-3570 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |