Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 98 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 10% better in FIFA 23 than Ryzen 5 1600 - 149 vs 136 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - €99.0 vs €128.17
- Up to 15% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i3-7100 - €0.73 vs €0.86 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 12 vs 4 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €128.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15279 minutes ago
Buy for €99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15280 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |