Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 405 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 2200G - 104 vs 100 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - €89.96 vs €128.17
- Up to 27% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-7100 - €0.9 vs €1.23 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €128.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
100
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |