Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4690 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4690 is 555 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 5% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8300 - 289 vs 274 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than FX-8300 - €51.13 vs €73.57
- Up to 33% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8300 - €0.18 vs €0.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €73.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18390 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €51.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18391 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 84 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |