Buy on Amazon
€79.81
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4690 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4690 is 1208 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 18% better in HITMAN 2 than Core i7-2600S - 136 vs 115 FPS
- Up to 11% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Core i7-2600S - €0.59 vs €0.66 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i5-4690 - €75.84 vs €79.81
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 8 vs 4 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4690
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.81
95%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-4690 CPU Verwendeter 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,5 GHz 6M 84W LGA1150
Buy for €79.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
CHYYAC Intel Core I7-2600S I7 2600S I7 2600 S 2,8 GHz Quad-Core Achtkern 65 W CPU Prozessor LGA 1155
Buy for €75.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4690
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Core i7-2600S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600S |
|---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
