Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 3305 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - €42.6 vs €282.63
- Up to 81% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i9-11900 - €0.55 vs €2.94 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 23% better in Remnant II than FX-6200 - 96 vs 78 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6436 minutes ago
Buy for €282.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6437 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |