Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 24% better in Valorant than Celeron G3900 - 864 vs 694 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - €53.15 vs €282.63
- Up to 76% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-11900 - €0.08 vs €0.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
864
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
24%
Price, €
€282.63
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €282.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15796 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
694
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €53.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15796 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |