Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 3964 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - €42.6 vs €128.9
- Up to 58% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-13100F - €0.37 vs €0.89 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 26% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-6200 - 145 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Buy for €128.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |