Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 32% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-2500K - 148 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - €43.94 vs €113.76
- Up to 49% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-13100F - €0.39 vs €0.77 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
50%
Price, €
€113.76
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
112
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100F | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |