Buy on Amazon
Out of Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1983 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Metro Exodus than FX-4350 - 144 vs 139 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 24 vs 4 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
CPU FX-Serie FX4350 FX-4350 FX 4350 4,2 GHz 125 W Quad-Core CPU Prozessor FD4350FRW4KHK Sockel AM3+ Führen Sie schnell aus, um Ihren Computer Laufen z
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 263 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2920X 3.5GHz 12-Core 24 Gewinde 32MB Cache TR4 Sockel OEM, YD292XA8UC9AF
Buy for €309.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Vishera | Codename | Colfax |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
