Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2558 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4350 - 191 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€245.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €245.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |